On 14 Nov 02  03:05:00, Alex Shakhaylo said the following to Bob Short:

AS>  AS>> Do you think it is too late to change something in this one ?
 
AS>  BS> At this time, yes.  The RC's may want to make changes to it before,
AS>  BS> referring it to a general *C vote for ratification, but I'm not too
AS>  BS> keen on the idea.  My preference would be to have it voted on as is.
 
AS> OK, I see. Do we have defined deadline ? If I workout amendment then run
AS> poll on my amendment among RCs and get positive result, will you include
AS> my amendment into new proposal ?  I'll ask them (RCs) to crosspost their
AS> answers to you to save the time and to get results verified.

I don't think you quite understand how this works (or should).  

Any proposed amendment(s) need to be discussed and drafted by a group
(of as many sysops as possible) before being presented.  This ensures
that is has met the tests of opinion and due consideration.  No single
individual can reasonably expect to offer positive changes that the
majority can agree to without affording others the opportunity for
dissent, unless it is/they are very minute and inconsequential.  Even
then, such must be presented to the IC, who then conducts a poll of
the RC's.

Our proposal has met these criteria, as should any future ones.  I do
invite you to participate in (if not directly initiate) future attempts
at change(s).  ;-)

Bob

--- GEcho 1.00