| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Knoppix |
WAYNE CHIRNSIDE wrote in a message to ROY J. TELLASON: RJT> There's a "Linux System Administrator's Guide" or something pretty RJT> close to that available online that covers a lot of stuff. I think I RJT> ended up with it with one of my installs, but if I run across a URL to RJT> it I'll send it to you. WC> Thanks, I'll do a search for it myself. The linux documentation project is probably a good place to start, it's a good place for _lots_ of info. WC> Have to check some Linux CD and books sales sites. RJT> There's *LOTS* of info available online. (See above. :-) RJT> Why copy it back and forth? Just put it in one place where both sides RJT> can get at it... WC> Potential use for the extra partition I left in there. You'll find something to do with it later, don't be in a hurry there. :-) RJT> Letting people try it out all sorts of ways without having to commit RJT> themselves, I guess. WC> IF they've got some RAM to play with. More and more a requirement these days, for pretty much anything nontrivial. WC> Bet with a little editing one could modify the knx-hdinstall script WC> one could copy the Knoppix image to a partition WC> and circumvent some of the RAM requirements by substituting WC> a swap file. Slow it down a great deal though. WC> This seems to be the mother of all Linux releases to get one WC> relatively fast tracked if one has the RAM to run it. (See above. :-) RJT> Looks like he's trying to get the win-users going... WC> Got me going and usefull right out of the gate :-) WC> Thanks once again for Charles Angelich in getting me going with WC> this and to Jim Holsonback that gave me a great deal on some used WC> DIMMS. WC> Found I could have squeaked by with the 96 Meg I'd had but far WC> happier with 256 :-) (See above. :-) I've only got 64M in the primary box here, and finally have that second box going with much more in it, but I need to get a bit more HD space in there. Maybe tomorrow I'll get out and see what can be seen with regard to the local HD market. That'd get me going all right... WC> All the bad changes happened after GTE became Verizon. RJT> No argument with that! WC> Unbelievable how cruddy they've gotten, looks like they're mdeling WC> themselves after AOL. WC> Changes in protocols have offed the usefullness of two modems, one WC> hardware and one software. WC> Verizon's home page now redirects one to a page where they're WC> pushing DSL so to get to the actual home page you've got to swing WC> back around. Sure, anything they can do to get more money out of you... My attitude toward this is that I don't have much of a choice for dealing with "the phone company" for local service (well, actually I do but that's another issue) -- I'll be damned if I give them my business for other things like 'net access. WC> Verizon's "online management" time used accounting link seems to WC> have permanently gone into "undergoing update, not currently WC> available" so one can't track their hours. Heh. Sort of reminds me of how my former provider used some weird javascript nonsense on "my account" where what I was supposed to see didn't display properly, and then they broke it to where I couldn't access the page at all through the link, though I could get there directly. And when informed about this they never fixed it. WC> No wonder I've been sending pe0ple to the local ISP www.ij.net. WC> Before I could log on either box, start a download, close the WC> browser and the dialer would hang up after the download was WC> complete. RJT> I was looking for some info today, and this one guy came back to me RJT> about how it was available -- as a 100-some-odd meg PDF file! Not on RJT> my dialup uh uh... WC> I snagged the DigiKey catalog at some 36 meg but that was before WC> Verizon altered it's protocols so I no longer have 56k access. That big? Maybe I'll ask them to send me a paper catalog. :-) RJT> If he says it's got the info I need in it (not sure at this point) I'm RJT> going to have to see what can be done to snag it through somebody who RJT> has a higher-speed connection, if I snag it at all. Working that out... WC> snip. RJT> Not to mention the lousy connect rates... I was emailing with my RJT> brother on this subject and gave him the local access number for my new RJT> outfit where he lives, and he had the same experience, going from not RJT> ever connecting any higher than 33.6 to 49-something on the first shot. RJT> He said something about giving them a chance to fix it, but they're RJT> not gonna fix it... RJT> Screw 'em. WC> Only took me about 14 phone calls and making a real pest of myself WC> and by that time I couldn't often understand a phone conversation WC> or maintain a 14,400 connection :-( Yeah, but you're talking about your phone lines, right? In this case it's not the phone lines for either of us, it's something that "pa.net" is doing that gives lousy connect rates. WC> In a couple of months when I setup Internet Junction, have to WC> inquire if they block the telnet port though. In either case I've WC> got a clean pair of telco wires :-) I have no time for any "provider" that's going to decide that they'll block _any_ port. I'm not buying into some jerk's idea of what the service should be, I'm buying a chunk of connectivity, nothing more. RJT> Yeah, you do have that going for you. Did I mention I'm still seeing RJT> "connect 52000" every single time? Can't complain about that... WC> I guess not! :-) WC> I've only gotten 51k a few times. What gets me is that when I was in Harrisburg, for a bit, I was using the exact same modem (when I got it), and I was seeing connect rates back then in the upper half of the 40s, so I really couldn't understand this nonsense about 31200... WC> I hate to pull the network card in my sole ISA slot in this machine WC> to put in an existing 56k ISA hardware modem I'd intended to use in WC> the now defunct NEC machine with 2 ISA slots. If you're talking 10mbps, a PCI card oughta be cheap enough. Betcha you can find a deal... RJT> When you do get around to the command-line stuff, mc is your friend. RJT> :-) WC> Already familar with it. RJT> Good. WC> Yup, mucked up my desktop as root the other day with all kinds of WC> very dangerous icons, went into mc and deleted the relavent files WC> and bye bye icons. WC> Heck I had an icon for /dev/hda1 mounted with write permission on WC> :-( That could've been messy. WC> I want to keep that under manual control however may use the spare WC> partition I made for Win 98 - Linux file keeping for ease of WC> access. RJT> You have a vendor picked out for that drive yet? WC> Torn between Seagate and W.D. still. RJT> Either one of them would be fine by me. Any difference in the RJT> warranty? WC> W.D. is down to 1 year, last I looked a while ago Seagate was WC> still three but that may well have changed. The 6.4G drive I have been running in the linux box since 1999 or 2000 is a refurb, somebody gave me a dead one that still had some warranty left on it and I sent it off to them, got this one in return, and it's been going strong ever since, spinning away 24/7. WC> Circuit City seems to have the best prices but CompUSA carries WC> some Seagate drives. RJT> That before or after rebates? WC> That's what I like about CC, they generally quote out the door WC> prices, CompUSA plays the rebate game. Ah. I'll say this about CC, too, they offer the most hassle-free return I've ever encountered. I bought some ram there, pulled one out and the box I was working on didn't see it right, so I walked back in there and was walking out with my cash in about a minute. WC> I did see a good deal at CompUSA IF the rebates actually happen. Them and the office chains are a real PITA as far as their web sites go, I don't really care to bother with them too much. WC> Still waiting on the 50 dollar dollar rebate from my ten year old WC> Canon Bj-200 :-( Yep! WC> I see from the the Linux hardware docs I'd be better off with an WC> H.P. Vectra line box which takes true parity memory. RJT> Lots of stuff out there supports it, if you can find it. I have one RJT> box here that insists on parity ram, and there's no option to disable RJT> the parity check on powerup so I have a couple of 16s and a couple of RJT> 4s in there giving me 40M. WC> Hey this box was FREE so no complaints :-) Likewise, except for shipping. RJT> I *think* that the MB I'm using now in the primary system also offers RJT> the option to support parity ram, but not having much of it here I RJT> don't know if I'm going to bother with trying that. If I had the RJT> funds, I'd get something that would support ECC ram and be done with RJT> it. WC> Yup. Perhaps cut a check to my sister and have her snag a brand WC> new bare bones system`from pricewatch.com. WC> Just checked the classifieds for used computers and people really WC> don't seem to have any idea how much their beloved systems have WC> depreciated. Heh. I can still remember some of the prices I used to see for C64 systems with bunches of software... There was just an ad in for a C128, with software -- for free! WC> 300 bucks at PriceWatch would have me in clover :-) WC> If Internet Junction's unlimited really is unlimited I've no need WC> for DSL. Big need is downloading ISO files on rare occassion. RJT> Or if you start spending some nontrivial time in alt.binaries.* RJT> newsgroups... :-) WC> well... there is the matter of alt.binaries.brunette... Yep, them's the ones I'm thinking of. :-) WC> That however hasn't intruded much lately. It is remarkably easy to waste a lot of time in there. Have you tried knode yet? I kind of like the way you can view the attachment before you decide whether or not to save it to disk. WC> You know it occured to me with all the government intrusiveness WC> available under the Patriot Act Knoppix in it's ramdrive mode just WC> saving the setup options provides an unbeatable measure of security WC> with nothing on the hard drive but your dialer, mail, browser and WC> newsgroup settings. Good point. You could even store that stuff on a floppy, and load in at boot time... WC> Nothing on my machine offensive to current regs but it IS a work WC> around for the paranoid. And you never can tell where they're going to go with that crap. WC> Let's see some clown attempt to recover files from RAM after CNTRL WC> - ALT - DEL or power off Just so. RJT> Biggest gripe I have about that Celeron box I'm working on is how darn RJT> long it takes for the thing to boot! I timed it -- it's about a minute RJT> and a half, or so -- before it either boots or goes into setup. It RJT> seems that even if you want to go into setup you still have to wait RJT> through all the hardware checks that it does. I'm not that impressed RJT> with that MB... WC> Well this board takes about a minute but I've RAM check turned on WC> as advised for Linux. I initially had "fast boot" disabled, figuring that it'd be just a bit more thorough than it would otherwise (some of these boxes run through the memory count more than once when I do that) and it took even longer, so I've turned some of the stuff off. WC> This option also allows plenty of blue screen time on boot in WC> which to hit F1 to enter CMOS setup. Yep. On the celeron box it still goes through all the tests even if you hit that... WC> Pretty much always on here now with power saving features enabled WC> with just a warm restart to go from 98 - Linux or back. I don't generally use any of the power saving stuff, matter of habit. WC> My current power saving features work in either Knoppix or 98 WC> seemlessly but I don't power down the drive and keep 14 watts into WC> the monitor to keep the filiment lit. Sounds good. WC> I figure this cuts down on potential cycling failures on the hard WC> drive as well as thermal shock to the monitor's filiment. Yes. WC> Think it was Tom Walker who mentioned USB 2.0 devices were WC> backwards compatable to 1.1 which would be outstanding as UPS's WC> have come down in price and I'd like to do clean shutdowns under WC> software control in the case of power interuption. 60 bucks now WC> buys you 8 minutes at near double my current draw. Or you might get lucky. I've got this thing here that looks like an outlet strip on steroids, that apparently has some smallish battery in it (I have yet to open it up), and I plan to run an external battery with it, see what I can accomplish. Got it for free, too. RJT> XMMS? It seems to work well for me, too. WC> Need to put that Turtle Beach sound card in to check it out. RJT> Yeah, get some music going... :-) WC> Well I can play it now through the software modem - sound card WC> thing in 98 but neither function is detected in Linux as I WC> expected from the get go. They're using the same DSP for both? You'd have a heck of a hard time playing music while online, though. :-) WC> Think I may have a go at locating the Linux software modem driver WC> for this one, it's available, and see if it's V90 compliant though. Good luck. ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 396/45 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.