PE> A couple of days ago you sent me a message which contained an
PE> origin line.  My system rejected it, and the rest of the packet.

What was the date on the packet, I cant
find it, tho its a tad awkward to search for.

PE> As I said in this echo a couple of months ago, I have fixed the problem
PE> with PQWK, the onus is on you to use the new PQWK or Tobruk will reject it.

The problem is that you barely even test changes, just release and pray.
It aint exactly a terrific idea to just use stuff released like that.

PE> I am recompiling Tobruk now, with that bit of code commented
PE> out, to allow what appears to be "routed echomail".  Then I
PE> will recompile it back to normal.  And then THAT IS IT.  NO MORE.

That doesnt sound like a terribly practical approach, because its quite
feasible for other than PKTs generated by PQWK to have that problem. In
other words, even if the latest PQWK is used, you havent allowed for
some other point which doesnt even use PQWK at all doing that blemish.

And its not as if its a particularly uncommon problem either.
@EOT:

---