On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:49:33 -0600, "Buffalo"
 wrote:

>wrote in message news:o41g0cdqtqn6t0gq4uqjkdc8ge2189m46v@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:39:46 -0400, legg  wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:52:42 -0500, mel@sajfd.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>There are 27 very favorable reviews for this AV over on Amazon.
>>>>
>>>>It has a very good rating on AV Comparatives.
>>>>https://www.av-comparatives.org/real-world-protection-test-september-2016/
>>>>
>>>>One comment I really like is this one: "the program is also fairly
>>>>lean or resources and they don't use a lot of unnecessary graphics to
>>>>many the application prettier or bigger."
>>>>
>>>>Anyone using it?  Your experience with it?
>>>
>>>There are various flavours - I can only vouch for the AV component,
>>>which has at times been difficult to purchase alone....
>>>
>>>RL
>>
>>Amazon carries the AV only version.  I got the '15 version because it
>>was quite a bit cheaper - and probably less bloat than the '16
>>version.

>Have you ever tried the free version of Avast?

Yeah.  A lot of years ago.  

>If so, what didn't you like about it?

I don't remember.  I read that today's version is full of ads.

>Just curious.

>I am running Win10 64 bit and am quite happy with it.
>Hope you enjoy your NODE32.

We'll see.  If I come up with the same problem, I'm gonna jump off the
roof - and onto the concrete driveway, not the grass.
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2