>>response would have been to re-hatch the file with
>>a "proper" description.

 JK> There are some people who'd prefer that when I mess up, like I
 JK> did that day, that I don't re-hatch.. the description is in
 JK> the file_id.diz in the archive at least.

/if/ there's a file_id.diz in the archive... the makenl sources don't have
one, for instance... we won't mention that all receiving sites would /have/
to process the incomming files to at least pull the file_id.diz and import
it (somehow) into their files databases...

)\/(ark