| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | another foul up |
CHARLES ANGELICH wrote in a message to ROY J. TELLASON: WC>> Well I've infozip zip and unzip here, it was in /usr/bin in WC>> Knoppix. RJT> If you look, you'll probably see that one is a link to the other. RJT> Nifty trick, that where some unix-type programs can act RJT> differently based on what name they were invoked with. The dos RJT> version I have on this box is supposed to act the same way, but RJT> unfortunately dos doesn't give me the option of making links, so I RJT> have two copies, with different names, wasting a whole 63k or so RJT> of disk space... :-) CA> Depending on what version of DOS you are using you can use CED.COM CA> to 'alias' multiple command line arguments using alias'd 'commands' CA> from the CLI. Never heard of it, and it doesn't look like a whole 63k of disk space is gonna make it worth messing with. CA> 4DOS can also do this. In spite of the many enthusiasts I've never installed that package, either. CA> Newer versions of DOS include DOSKEY.COM which can alias commands CA> but I'm not sure it can store them and then restore the alias's CA> after a reboot? CED.COM can store them and restore them at each CA> boot of the machine to DOS. (Yes, CED.COM _is_ available from my CA> website) CA> :-) I'm not sure how the heck the program works, as dos doesn't provide a running program with what under linux and elsewhere would be argc[0], the name it was invoked under. FWIW, the version here is 6.2, I never saw any point to moving to 6.22 since that version release was a result of the Stac lawsuit and the changes are minimal. RJT> WC>> Don't think I'll be buying that partition imaging program either WC>> as the one that comes with Knoppix does FAT 16, 32, ext2fs but WC>> unfortunately not ext3fs. RJT> Not much difference there -- you can go from ext3 to ext2 and back RJT> again without much trouble. Just involves something to do with the RJT> journal file. I forget the details but someone in the linux echo RJT> would know. That's one of the reasons I went to ext3 on my RJT> partitions here when I had some flaky power, things were getting RJT> too tedious waiting for those filesystem checks when it RJT> returned... CA> I took the time to read up on journaling filesystems and have CA> forgotten most of what I read. :-\ Where did you find the info? I know that there are probably specific sites for each variant, but I'm more interested in how they compare with each other. I know that some of them will back up only metadata, while others do more. I've got jfs, reiserfs, and xfs (?) here, should I decide that I want to play with them. Not that this seems likely at this point. ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 396/45 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.