From: "Robert Comer" 

No, sorry, I don't, it's just from experience...

- Bob Comer


"Ellen K"  wrote in message
news:d096c6.c308b5{at}harborwebs.com...
> Can you point me to some documentation I can present to support that view?
>
> > From: "Robert Comer" 
> > 1 timeout out of 4 in a ping is not normal.
> > - Bob Comer
> > "Ellen K"  wrote in message
> > news:0096bf.c2a4c7{at}harborwebs.com...
> >> Well, I didn't.
> >>
> >> The latest is:
> >>
> >> 1.  There were THREE NICs in the box, they disabled the two 10/100's
and
> > set
> >> the gigabit one to manual, 1000 full duplex.
> >>
> >> 2.  NewlyMintedNetworkGuy said something about the box having been
> > configured
> >> as a trunk (well, not "a trunk", but
"trunk" was in there somewhere)
which
> >> didn't make sense to him so now he made it just like my other server.
> >>
> >> 3.  My development partner (who does the front ends) said actually on
my
> > other
> >> server the users DO sometimes lose the connection.  (!)   He also said
if
> > the
> >> ping test shows for example 3 packets received and 1 lost, that is
normal.
> >> (!!!)   However, he said he would be concerned if all the users lost
their
> >> connections at the same time.  So now I have the script running on two
> >> different desktops and tomorrow we'll see whether they had problems at
the
> > same
> >> time.   Also instead of searching for "Request timed
out" I will search
> > for
> >> "Received = 0".
> >>
> >> 4.  NewlyMintedNetworkGuy said the network sniffer is busy sniffing the
TJ
> >> traffic and we can't use it, but he has some other tool he will set up.
> >>
> >> 5.  The NT admin turned on PerfMon.
> >>
> >> So tomorrow we should hopefully know more.
> >>
> >> > From: John Cuccia 
> >> > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 10:17:15 -0700, Ellen K.
> >> >  wrote:
> >> >> I will ask.
> >> > No need, if you aren't using AD.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5