Oh, if it's you, he won't mind.   :)

> From: "Antti Kurenniemi" 
> Never. But when the web gets a bit faster, I'll tap into his archive and
> watch all the shows these guys keep talking about that are never aired here
> ;-)
> Antti Kurenniemi
> (though I don't have time for it either...)
> "Ellen K."  wrote in message
> news:2svob09ugl704ape65s5cgeav5gjkr9vgd{at}4ax.com...
>> 2000 hours?   When are you ever gonna watch that?
>> 
>> On Mon, 31 May 2004 20:26:34 -0400, "Geo."
 wrote in
>> message :
>> 
>> >"Gregg"  wrote in message
>> >news:Xns94FAC52531976gregginvalidinvalid{at}216.144.1.254...
>> >
>> >> Well if the idle process is not getting any CPU time, then Windows
> would
>> >> know that CPU utilization is 100%. It wouldn't need to
know what else
> is
>> >> using the CPU.
>> >
>> >Excellent logic! The idle process was indeed showing 0%.
>> >
>> >> I still have a 1.6G drive in my computer. (Alright, I
also have a 20G
>> >> drive).
>> >
>> >You aren't into storing video like I am. 
>> >
>> >At a guess I've probably got about 2000 hours of video stored on it so
> far. No
>> >more cabinet full of VHS tapes in the livingroom.
>> >
>> >Geo.
>> >
>> 

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5