-=> On 06-07-04  14:31,  Thom Lacosta <=-
 -=> spoke to Bob Short about Last P4 proposal <=-

 BS> You prefer to wade through an entire document(s), comparing it to
 BS> the current one, to find the proposed changes, over a list?  

 TL> Read Policy 4...it's very specific that as an RC I have to 
 TL> consider the whole document.  It doesn't allow me to use 
 TL> Cliff Notes for Policy as my guide.
 
  What was presented originally was a summary of changes, *AND* the
  complete wording for the section that was being changed, namely
  section 8.   We did not present sections 2 through 7 because it seemed
  a waste of bandwidth -- and since every one already had copies of
  them.

  Eventually, primarily because of PK's insistence, the entire proposed
  document was presented , split over multiple messages.  To this day, I
  fail to see why that added anything to any RCs ability to make a
  decision on the proposed changes.   IMO, that insistence was a noise
  factor intended to disrupt the proceedings.

                        dale (at) min (dot) net
                              (1:261/1466)





... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 00:16:20, 08 Jun 2004
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01