JF>Well... In my final opinion, NO STUDNET should have been punished till
  >the lab reported the pill's content.
JF>As I said. As a cop, You would not jail someone for pushing nartocics
  >till you are SURE IT IS NARTOCIS they are pushing.
JF>You need a suspusion to detain someone breifly, But then you do the
  >research before filing formal charges.
JF>The Schools don't do this... they act on the suspusion only and don't
  >even do the barest research into what happened.  This is wrong.
Police action includes testing these substances because their 
composition is at issue and must be proven in court.  In the cases you
are referring to, I doubt there was any issue that the substance was
a glucose tablet.  That was probably admitted and evident on the face
of the matter.  Unfortunately, school rules prohibit such tablets.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * Belief is no substitute for arithmetic.
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------