From: "Hrvoje Mesing" 


"Robert Comer"  wrote in
message news:40daf8b8$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> It works well on NT4 too, though I'd allocate 64M on the system
partition...
>
> - Bob Comer


> "Frank Haber"  wrote in message
> news:40daf579$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Ellen jogged my memory.
> >
> > With Win 2000 workstation, if you have two physical hard drives, keeping
> just
> > 20MB of swap on the boot drive and putting the big one on the second HD
> works
> > just ducky.  How about NT4 Server SP6?
> >
> > I have clients still using NT for odds and ends, and the SCSI drives are
> > getting a bit small for current filesizes.  I've moved user/client
storage
> to
> > something more economical, but the vertical apps have to be on NT4, and
6
> +
> > 9GB is getting tight.

-+-

*uhm!*

What exactly "ducky" means ? Good or bad ?

So, if Win * WorkStation has 1G RAM, 2 HDD, the right/fast/memory dump free
combination would be 64-128MB RAM on sys/boot part., 1.2G - 1.4G on the
other non-boot part. ?!

Im interested in iRL facts.


-+-
M.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5