Hi Mark,

 MD> RG> postings, and *I've* been doing my bit by
 MD> RG> posting my words of wisdom
 MD> Not sure whether thats a subtle dig at ne or not (-: (-:

Nah, Just letting you know that the yanks are aware of our mail feed
problems so they aren't expecting to here from anyone else over here
:-(

 MD> RG> BTW, we are not alone in being cut off..
 MD> RG> it appears that the source of
 MD> RG> the problem is with the feed to DBAR..
 MD>
 MD> Bummer..
 MD> I thought he hadn't seemed to have been as busy as usual (:

FWIW, he (Steve Craik) is only quiet 'cos he's got no one to talk too
:-(
'Corse, I suppose we could alleviate that by sending him messages..
For all intents and purposes he is cut off on our side of the ocean.

 MD> RG> Yeah, I only hope that it doesn't turn too many people off :-(
 MD> Dunno... As long as you're not it a hurry for the replies AND you

Certainly no hurry...  that why I suggest people use it for at least a
couple of months before filling it in.

 MD> remind people every now and then.. The

I'll resort to that if I have too :-)

 MD> occasional CBM echo message to
 MD> me saying "Gee I've only recieved xx surverys so far" (-:

Nah, too discrete... I'll take the approach of, "of the xx surveys
received so far, it seems like no-one is using xxxxxx function,
therefore it will be dropped from the next release) (I'll ensure that
"xxxxx" is somthing important like the export routines. 

 MD> BTW got the disk with the PCIII doc files, ta..

Bet that was a dissappoitment  for you,  recieving a disk,
expecting some new goodies on it to play with, only to find it is
something you are probably sick of seeing by now :-)

BTW, when I go with V4.2 I'll be leaving those doc's intact, and adding
a readme file to detail the differences between V4.1 and V4.2.
The changes being pretty small I reckon they would get "lost" if I
included them in the main doc's. ;-)

Cheers
Rod
___ QWKRR128 V4.2 [R]

--- EzyQwk V1.05