Paul, at 14:26 on May 12 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley...

PE> What 2.60 bugs?

BG> There is no such thing as bug-free software.  Even you should realise that.

PE> In other words, you don't know of any.  As I thought. 

BG> Are you trying to suggest that the majority of available applications is 
BG> completely free of bugs?  Sorry, but I simply refuse to believe that.

PE> Not at all.  Just that you are unlikely to have noticed more in 2.60
PE> than you did in 2.59.

That would actually be quite difficult, given that (a) I've found no
obvious bugs in 2.59 and (b) I don't use 2.60 anyway.  Why the hell should
I change?

PE> You might notice that quite a lot of people, including David Drummond, are
PE> running it.

BG> Wasn't it you who mentioned that the DOS version of 2.60 had a nasty bug?  
BG> Anyway, it doesn't really matter, as I'm not running it.  :)

PE> Not me.  BFN.  Paul.

Strange, somebody definitely said there was a report in the BINKLEY echo
about a major bug in the DOS version of 2.60.  Wonder who it was then? 

Regards, Bill

--- Msgedsq/2 3.20