Wilfred van Velzen wrote:

WVV>  TK>>> Exactly! Very bad performace here! :) I must adjust the
WVV>  TK>>> semaphore timings!
WVV>
WVV>  TK>>> Alan's message was stored into msg base at 2:221/1 like
WVV>  TK>>> this:
WVV>
WVV>  TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6 154/10 301/1         27 May 21 04:12:02
WVV>  TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6 460/58 280/464       27 May 21 04:12:06
WVV>  TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6                      27 May 21 04:12:12
WVV>  TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6 280/5555             27 May 21 04:12:56
WVV>
WVV>  WV>> Still surprising the direct path is slower then the route
WVV>  WV>> through the USA and Switzerland! ;)
WVV>
WVV>  TK> It's all about timing. Bad luck for direct pkt's this time.
WVV>  TK> We are talking about seconds now, remember. :D
WVV>
WVV>  TK> I'm not going to check binkd logs but sometimes .pkt's are
WVV>  TK> waiting few seconds in inbound to be tossed.
WVV>
WVV> Who would have been thinking, 25 years ago, we would be having
WVV> these kind of discussions now! ;-)

Who would have been thinking, 25 years ago, that fidonet still exists
in 2021. ;-)

'Tommi

--- Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)