Hi Tommi,

On 2021-05-27 19:51:00, you wrote to me:

 WV>>>> Or how slow 221/1 tosses? ;-)

 TK>>> Exactly! Very bad performace here! :) I must adjust the semaphore
 TK>>> timings!

 TK>>> Alan's message was stored into msg base at 2:221/1 like this:

 TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6 154/10 301/1         27 May 21 04:12:02
 TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6 460/58 280/464       27 May 21 04:12:06
 TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6                      27 May 21 04:12:12
 TK>>> PATH: 153/757 221/6 280/5555             27 May 21 04:12:56

 WV>> Still surprising the direct path is slower then the route through the
 WV>> USA and Switzerland! ;)

 TK> It's all about timing. Bad luck for direct pkt's this time. We are talking
 TK> about seconds now, remember. :D

 TK> I'm not going to check binkd logs but sometimes .pkt's are waiting few
 TK> seconds in inbound to be tossed.

Who would have been thinking, 25 years ago, we would be having these kind of discussions now! ;-)

 TK>>> Path via /464 was also quite slow. :D

 WV>> We would have to take out 460/58 to fix that... ;)

 TK> Do you need a direct link to 2:221/6 ? ;)

Do you think it would add anymore redundancy then we already have in the fidoweb? Nah, nevermind... ;)

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815