-=> Quoting Justin Baustert to David Hartung <=-
 DH> Well, at least you are consistent, but answer a question please. If
 DH> there are valid medicinal uses (which has yet to be proven), why
 DH> should such a use be outlawed?
 JB> I feel there needs to be a very distinct line between what should and 
 JB> shouldn't be allowed.  I've heard that there are cases where MaryJ has
 JB> been  used to curb nausea.  I'd suggest Pepto-Bismol if there is not
 JB> another single  drug available that will give similar results..
 Let me get this straight, you oppose any use of Marijuana, even if it
 should be proven that there are valid medical uses? On the one hand
 you are a supporter of the tobacco settlement because of the health
 hazards of tobacco, yet you would deny someone medical treatment
 because you don't approve of the drug being used? Doesn't this strike
 you as just a little bit inconsistent?
 Don't get me wrong, I am strongly opposed to the drug scene, but I
 believe that if a given substance proves to have valid medical use,
 then such should be used.
 david.hartung@mcione.com
 Ilks of Metropolitan Walls/LENS
 Proud member of White House Enemies database
... A bad day with Reagan is better than any day with Clinton.
___ Blue Wave/386 v2.21 [NR]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------