CH>> Why do you say you don't think it should be done?  Just
 CH>> looking for a point clarification.

 DS>   Because it would be putting the bossnode into a possibly awkward
 DS>   position.   The bossnode is responsible for what ever comes out of the
 DS>   point's system, which would include any users the point might have.

if the bossnode is willing, that's up to him... back in the day, we were
quite willing and besides having our own multinode bbs with a point
assigned to each node, we also fed stuff to several other bbs' while they
were learning the ropes...

 DS>   I think that if a person is going to have users, then they ought to
 DS>   become nodes and accept personal responsibility rather than passing the
 DS>   buck to the bossnode (who is not even in a position to vet the users).

they are in just as much position as a *EC or other to cut someone's feed...

)\/(ark