| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: PASCAL AND ??? |
-=> Quoting Louis Rizzuto to All <=- LR> Perhaps some of you experts can be of help. I am taking a look at LR> my next move as far as converting my apps. It seems that for the time LR> being I am stuck with converting it to Windows due to borland's lack of LR> support for OS2 - for Pascal guys like me. I'm in the same boat! Though I use Borland C++ also, I have *alot* of man hours invested in BP apps. LR> I have a large apps, and I am looking for the least expensive way to LR> upgrade it for the newer GUI's - without trying to forget the next LR> moves in the future. I am hoping I can stick with Pascal since LR> converting this huge many man-year apps to C++ is going to be a real LR> tribulation. There is a patch available called BPOS2 which will patch BP 7 to make it compile to an OS/2 platform. I've used it alittle bit, but haven't had time to really give it a good thrashing. It's not an ideal solution. If you find you simply must convert the code... try something called Guidelines (available on FernWood area of IBM BBS's).... again, I haven't had a chance to use it alot, but what I see, I like!! You must have compiler(s) for the target platform: Borland C++ for OS/2 and/or Borland C++ 3.1. It will compile to Windows and OS/2 PM platforms using the same "source". It's very visual and easy to use, and generates C++ code which you can "massage" to your hearts content! LR> What I am using right now is Borland's Pascal, LR> professional version, 6.0. My apps is written using procedures vs OOPS. LR> So since I already have the compiler to convert my apps to OOPS, and LR> using Borland's TV, this seems to be the next logical step - or is it? LR> Has anyone been where I am and done this - converted their procedure LR> Pascal apps to TV and OOPs? I hear nitemarish stories about Borland's LR> TV - at least for 6.0 but perhaps the new BP 7.0 is not as "bad". LR> Does anyone have any experience on these matters? Your help would be LR> most appreciated. Thanks. This is the real reason I'm replying to your post: I struggled with TV for a month or so before feeling totally comfortable with it: now I've been using it for about 2 years. There is no basic difference between TV 1.0 (which came with BP v6.0) and TV 2.0 (which comes with BP 7.0), but I would *definately* recommend you upgrade to BP7 - the biggest single reason being for being able to compile Protected Mode apps. If your apps are big, you'll want this!! As for TV itself: I find it really quite good. My biggest dislike about it is the method of setting colours for your app. IMO, it is well worth the effort in learning it: but be warned: you MUST be totally comfortable with OOP to be efficient with it! Regards, Kai. ... Official Tagline of the Sydney 2000 Olympics ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 --- TPCB V0.5b* Origin: Prophet BBS, Western Sydney Australia (3:54/54) SEEN-BY: 54/54 620/243 624/50 711/409 413 430 807 808 809 934 942 712/623 SEEN-BY: 713/888 800/1 @PATH: 54/54 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.