| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | origin line |
PE> Ok, on the origin line question, yes you were right, it was the PE> MSGID, not the origin line, that caused it to get the wrong address. RS> I still cant see how it can do that when it was INSIDE the RS> SOT/EOT which was SPECIFICALLY intended to allow for that RS> problem of stuff that would normally be part of the mail non RS> text body appearing in what is meant to be the body of the text. PE> It specifically disallows intra-text kludge PE> lines, except those meant to mark-up text. Yes, and thats fucked by design, makes no sense whatever. PE> All echomail, that I send to Dave Hatch, has MSGs in the PKT PE> with a from address of 3:711/934, a destination of 3:711/809. PE> If I were to send an echomail message with an address of PE> 3:640/305, a destination of 3:711/809, then as far as 3:711/809 PE> is concerned, he just received a routed echomail message. Still says nothing useful whatever about why Tobruk is mindlessly scanning for MSGIDs in the body of a message, BETWEEN the SOT/EOT pair. Arent you still having a brain fart about embedded origin lines which werent even IN that message, and which are ALLOWED between an SOT/EOT pair anyway ? You quite sure you have been taking your medication ? PE> Both problems were fixed in 2.60. RS> Dunno, I still dont see that thats the correct place to fix it. RS> Surely since it was within the SOT/EOT, the problem is in Tobruk RS> which didnt ignore the superfluous MSGID in the message body. PE> Tobruk has every right to reject the PE> out-of-spec MSGID, in the wrong place. Nope, makes no sense to do that, in fact it makes much more sense to ALLOW those between the SOT/EOT pair, just like other stuff. PE> However, it's not smart enough to do that. It should be smart enough to not check for kludge lines between the SOT/EOT pair. PE> GMD might be. In this case, it was rejected not because PE> of the intra-text MSGID, but because of the incorrect PE> address in the fixed header portion of the message in the PKT. I still cant see why Tobruk is using an address form that embedded MSGID at all, thats fucked. RS> Either you are having a brain fart or I am. PE> You are. I can send you the PKT if you want to see it. PE> You can use inspecta to see the address in the header portion. Says nothing useful whatever about why Tobruk had a massive brain fart and used the address from that embedded MSGID between an SOT/EOT pair. THATS where the problem lies. Makes no sense to do that. @EOT: ---* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.