From: "Robert Comer" 

> What exactly "ducky" means ? Good or bad ?

Good.

> So, if Win * WorkStation has 1G RAM, 2 HDD, the right/fast/memory dump
free
> combination would be 64-128MB RAM on sys/boot part., 1.2G - 1.4G on the
> other non-boot part. ?!

Yep, but it depends on the load, I use the least used disk for the swap
files -- you don't want to put swap on your data disk if it's already
getting hit all the time.

I've been known to add a disk just for the swap file.  And I also use fixed
sized swap files, not expanding ones...

>iRL

?

- Bob Comer


"Hrvoje Mesing"  wrote in
message news:40db2044{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Robert Comer" 
wrote in message
> news:40daf8b8$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > It works well on NT4 too, though I'd allocate 64M on the system
> partition...
> >
> > - Bob Comer
>
>
> > "Frank Haber"  wrote in message
> > news:40daf579$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > Ellen jogged my memory.
> > >
> > > With Win 2000 workstation, if you have two physical hard drives,
keeping
> > just
> > > 20MB of swap on the boot drive and putting the big one on the second
HD
> > works
> > > just ducky.  How about NT4 Server SP6?
> > >
> > > I have clients still using NT for odds and ends, and the SCSI drives
are
> > > getting a bit small for current filesizes.  I've moved user/client
> storage
> > to
> > > something more economical, but the vertical apps have to be on NT4,
and
> 6
> > +
> > > 9GB is getting tight.
>
> ---
>
> *uhm!*
>
> What exactly "ducky" means ? Good or bad ?
>
> So, if Win * WorkStation has 1G RAM, 2 HDD, the right/fast/memory dump
free
> combination would be 64-128MB RAM on sys/boot part., 1.2G - 1.4G on the
> other non-boot part. ?!
>
> Im interested in iRL facts.
>
>
> ---
> M.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5