PE> Why you thought it was more prudent to just say "it's only a
one-off thing" 
PE> rather than treat it as a piece of test data worth investigating can only 
PE> be explained in light of FRZ.

BG> ALL problems, no matter how trivial or infrequent, have causes, but if 
BG> they're extremely uncommon (or one-offs), finding said cause may be rather 
BG> difficult, if not completely impossible.

Sure, I am happy for USR to say "we need more test data, we are
unable to reproduce the problem here, can you trying set S100=5
and calling again and giving me a log of the problem".  No problem,
whatsoever.

PE> And Rod's problem was washed away too, David alluded to the real
PE> reason, USR couldn't give a shit, they think they can make more
PE> money by NOT fixing a bug in that regard. 

BG> Another arse-blown opinion of yours being passed off as fact, perhaps ?

What fact is that, Bill?  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---