RS> I was aware that you had fixed a problem concerning ORIGIN lines and
RS> was sure that I was not producing messages WITH EMBEDDED ORIGIN lines,
RS> and it made considerable sense in the situation where the change was
RS> not thoroughly tested, to wait until it had been tested more thoroughly
RS> and see if there had been any subtle blemishes introduced as well.
Yeah, that is fair enough. That's why I said it was partly my
fault, for all I knew, you were taking care not to insert origin
lines. BFN. Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|