> In a message to Marvin Hart 
 > rowan crowe  wrote:

 > NM>>> {at}REPLY: 3:635/727.1{at}FIDOnet 1D8F5675
 > ...

 > >     I still think however, that changing the capitalisation when
 > > generating ^aREPLY is (a) wrong, and (b) silly (what's the reason
 > > for doing it?).

 > It's certainly out-of-spec, that's for sure.  I don't think
 > it's a particularly serious issue though; I can't see most
 > current software failing because of this.

Define "failing".

Every piece of software I've written which uses MSGID/REPLY (and that's
three), will "fail" because of this.  And I don't intend to
modify around a clear and unarguable breach of the specification either.
Reply linking is slow enough without having to make it case insensitive as
well (thereby more than doubling the time it takes).

---