| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | p4 amendments |
Hi, Dale! 20 Nov 02 00:22, Dale Shipp said to Alex Shakhaylo: AS>> May be. But in my neck of the wood this amendment is not AS>> welcomed. Does it count ? DS> Why not? Do you prefer things the way that they are? No. But amendment doesn't change much. AS>> If any changes are going to be accepted they must reflect the AS>> current situation. I only want that every fidonet member's voice AS>> was equally heard and accounted. Unfortunately, your amendment is AS>> a step back in this sence :( DS> I think you are wrong on which direction this step is taking. It DS> is making the ability to change policy possible. That is a step DS> forward, not backward. Policy may be changed at any moment by sysops' referenda. We need to run just one time networkwide referenda which approves proportional mechanism and then we may change policy annually if you like. Bye, Sinc, Alex --- GoldED/W32 3.0.1* Origin: , (2:461/701) SEEN-BY: 120/544 123/500 461/700 701 633/260 262 267 270 285 634/383 640/954 SEEN-BY: 654/0 690/682 771/4020 774/605 2432/200 7105/1 @PATH: 461/701 700 123/500 774/605 633/260 285 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.