TE>-=> Quoting Steve Fragner to Tom Enright <=-
TE> TE> The period is not the only punctuation mark on your keyboard.
TE> TE> Please learn to use the other ones, such as the comma.
TE> SF> ...........................
TE>It appears that correct English usage and common courtesy is
TE>beyond you.  We've come to expect that from liberals.
TE> TE> Why do you advocate punishment for these two kids but none for
TE> TE> Clinton?
TE> SF> If Clinton committed perjury than charge him.
TE>Don't you mean "then charge him?"  That's up to a grand-jury
TE>after reviewing the evidence.  The evidence that Clinton is doing
TE>his best to destroy or hide.
TE> SF> Since when does
TE> SF> it cost $13,000,000 to decide if a crime was committed?
TE>When the object of the investigation destroys evidence,
TE>intimidates witnesses, and delays the investigation at every
TE>opportunity.  The "executive privilege" claim is an excellent
TE>example.  It applies *only* to matters of national security and
TE>defense.  That was settled by the Supreme Court during the Nixon
TE>investigation.  Yet Billy-Bob is still claiming it.
TE>It's also interesting to note that Hillary worked for the Nixon
TE>prosecutor and put forward the opinion the President had *no*
TE>right to legal representation in such an investigation.  I guess
TE>it's different now that she is involved on the other side.
TE> TE> Or do you classify any questioning of your statements as
TE> TE> "double-talk?"  While you are at it, explain what about Robert
TE> TE> Plett's statements to you constitute double-talk.  Before
TE> TE> posting, try looking the term up.
TE> SF> My argument arose from me looking it up.  Get all the facts
TE> SF> together, then respond.............................
TE>Congratulations, you've just called yourself a liar. "Getting all
TE>the facts" before responding is the opposite of what you have
TE>done.  You're posts read like socialist agit-prop.  They have no
TE>connection to reality, only to what sounds good.
TE>Your refusal to answer my question is glaringly obvious by it's
TE>absence from your reply.  Making spurious self-righteous claims
TE>to avoid addressing the question is another characteristic we've
TE>come to expect from liberals.
Tom:
Does this mean we can use the lad for drive by practice? 
After all, he subscribes to the philosophy currently in vogue with main 
stream journalists: "Why let the facts get in the way of a good story?"
John
___
X CMPQwk #1.42X UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------