SF>-> The period is not the only punctuation mark on your keyboard.
SF>-> Please learn to use the other ones, such as the comma.
SF>         ...........................
SF>-> Why do you advocate punishment for these two kids but none for
SF>-> Clinton?  Is it because the crime was murder, the age of the
SF>-> offenders, or the fact that neither of them is President?  If it
SF>-> is the latter, what gives you the idea that the President is
SF>-> above the law?
SF>       If Clinton committed perjury than charge him.  Since 
SF>when does it cost $13,000,000 to decide if a crime was 
SF>committed?
A. If memory serves me correctly, and it does, Lawrence Walsh, late of 
Ken Starr bashing fame, spent in excess of $100 million in Iran Contra 
and didn't get diddly for all of his efforts. The most memorable event 
was when he indicted Cap Weinberger four days before the 92 election 
only to have the indictment thrown out for insufficiency. 
And Mr. Walsh has the huevos to claim that Judge Starr's investigation 
is partisan? There's a word for this and similar behavior. It's 
Hypocrisy. And LIbEralS are very adept at hypocrisy. 
B. There is some question, legally speaking, whether or not a sitting 
President can be indicted. 
I have a very simple soloution to Judge Starr's dilemma. Charge Hillary, 
Nussbaum, Blumenthal, Williams (Maggie), et al. and name William 
Jefferson Blythe Clinton as an unindicted coconspirator. Then turn the 
entire mess over to Congress for impeachment proceedings. 
As for Specter and others in the Senate urging "caution", at this 
juncture, there appears to be sufficient evidence, however 
circumstantial it may be, that would warrant an impeachment hearing. To 
say that we shouldn't have a hearing unless ther is a "smoking gun" is 
ridiculous. Criminal cases based upon far less circumstantial evidence 
are filed each day in various courts throughout this country which 
result in convictions.
What this amounts to is that the President apparrently IS above the law 
if and ONLY if he or she is a LIbEral Democrat. 
C. Starr is still conducting an investigation which is being hampered by 
the White House refusing to timely (the key word) turn over subpoenaed 
documents and provide oral testimony. The fact that the President is 
invoking Executive Privilege every chance he gets, isn't helping this 
investigation along. Yet the White House and the President, are 
complaining that this investigation is taking too long. 
What Chutzpah! What hypocrisy! 
John
___
X CMPQwk #1.42X UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------