Richard Town wrote in a message to David Bowerman:
 RT> That's a story.  Or is v.pcm SG16 recommendation to ITU(t) already
 RT> riddled with possible incompatabilities?
 DB> Hardly a story in the accepted sense of a work of fiction.  It is a
 DB> story in the sense of a report of the known facts concerning the matter
 DB> in question.
 RT> True, somebody somewhere has said something.  But the implications
 RT> are far more serious.  For if V.90 is so riddled with
 RT> incompatibilities as to render is useless, then of what use _is_
 RT> ITU(t) in this regard? 
Perhaps you should check out a copy of the V.90 draft before babbling on 
about it being riddled with incompatibilities.
 RT> I've often opined that it it's the silicon processors that have
 RT> control in the New World Order.  But I'd never expected that the
 RT> NWO would've been seen to have usurped democracy so fast, nor as
 RT> blatently 
 DB> If you have a source for your belief that those reports are incorrect
 DB> (other than your simple child-like faith that Rockwell can do no
 DB> wrong), please post that source.  Either a quote or a url will do.
 RT> Erm, what belief is this, David?
Your claims that the reports that Rockwell will not be doing interop testing 
are stories -- as in fiction.  So please post information from another 
Rockwell official stating that the comments from a Rockwell VP that Rockwell 
would not participate in interop testing are false.  Or perhaps you could 
post information showing that Lucent, 3Com and ZyXEL representatives were 
lying about doing interop testing.  Your choice.
To put it bluntly, put up or shut up.
If you can't post any such information, stuff your bloody Zoom modem into any 
convenient body orifice and quit wasting our time with your attempts as a 
Rockwell apologist.
 RT> Still no response on V34 interop (the original thread) whilst
 RT> gushing all over V.90...
Richard, you have had several messages posted to you on the V.34 problems.  
You might remember the ones from Craig Ford with the data output showing how 
Rockwell's implementation misreported it's capabilities?  The messages that 
you seem to conveniently disregard in your whining about USR.
Regards,
       David
--- timEd/2 1.10+
---------------