FR> While we're engaged in philosophical debate about fictional
RT> characters, FR>> how many cultists in this forum would like to argue
RT> that learning more FR>> than one language is contrary to the wishes or
RT> desires of their gods?
FR> After all, in the Christanic mythologies, the pantheon of
RT> deities FR>> created a multitude of languages specifically to keep
RT> humanity
FR> ignorant. When we learn to speak alien languages, aren't
RT> believers in FR>> the Christian gods in direct discord with the desires
RT> of their deities?
FR> I would be interested in learning if there are other gods and
RT> goddesses FR>> which were also responsible for the multitude of
RT> languages.
FM> There's a direct challenge you've set up for yourself. Perhaps you
FM> could, in all of your superior wisdom give us the specific, scientific
FM> reason why homo sapiens has been for so long and for the foreseeable
FM> future locked into a multiplicity of languages?
RT> For the foreseeable future? I'm not sure about that Frank. With the
RT> advent of global communications it would seem we are heading down a road
RT> of unification of languages, and to be quite honest, I think that would
RT> be a major step forward to a closer knit world community.
You MUST be kidding. The multiplication of computer languages is already
swamping us and that is on top of the still quite active, living cultural
languages of the world. Do you KNOW the fate of all attempts to formulate
nd
activate ONE global language?
RT> We take a single population and isolate them on two island, cut then off
RT> from the rest of the world and each other and allow them to evolve. They
RT> have no further contact with anyone not of their own island. We wait
RT> from a couple of hundred years, to maybe a thousand or two and then we
RT> go back to the islands to see how they speak. We find that the languages
RT> have evolved in two different directions. Why would this be do you
RT> think?
RT> You might find "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker (ISBN
RT> 0-14-017529-6 [Penguin] 8.99ukp) to be an excellent non-technical
RT> grounder in the mechanics of language evolution and structure if you
RT> have further interest.
I wasn't talking about the "mechanics." I was talking about the reality.
The drive to reproduce seems to be accompanied by the drive to divide into
camps, each with its separate language. We try to salve this phenomenon with
modern myths about "world peace" et cetera. Intellectuals DO make decided
attempts to overcome these separations, often with amazing success as with
technical fields and mathematics. In centuries ahead globalization might
ven
make some headways but as the boundaries of the cosmos (universe) are pushed
back other cultural entities may emerge to offset it. That, we simply do not
know yet.
Sincerely,
Frank
--- PPoint 2.05
---------------
* Origin: Maybe in 5,000 years - frankmas@juno.com (1:396/45.12)
|