From: "Robert Comer" 

Almost as well, which is enough better to make it worth it. It can still
get corrupted, but it's rare.

I also like to use NTFS compression on some types of files.

- Bob Comer


"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:41213e2c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Does the journaling really work as well in the real world as a practical
> matter as it does in theory?
>
> Gary
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:41209627$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> The biggest plus of NTFS is the journaling, and what that means is it
>> basically can take things like power outages and BSOD's much better
> without
>> corruption of files.
>>
>> - Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:41208615$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > If you don't need NTFS for security, are there other reasons why you
> would
>> > prefer NTFS over FAT32?  I like being able to do things with the Win2K
> on
>> > Fat32 partition that I can't so easily do if it were NTFS.  What are
> your
>> > thoughts on this?
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > "Ellen K"  wrote in message
>> > news:a09911.061078{at}harborwebs.com...
>> >> So, that's a big deal.  Who uses FAT any more anyway? 
(Although here
>> >> it's
>> > on
>> >> the C drive of my desktop.  But I made them format the second HDD
> NTFS.)
>> >>
>> >> > From: "Geo." 
>> >> > "Ellen K."
 wrote in
> message
>> >> > news:sos4h0lciqhcjk25tgm2r02tuk07ihcqva{at}4ax.com...
>> >> >> That is really impressive.
>> >> > Only because nobody else has done it on NTFS, heck
on FAT it's a
>> > standard
>> >> > feature.
>> >> > Geo.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5