From: "Gary Britt" 

Certainly I agree.  Does the journaling really make that much of a
difference on a non-raid single idea or scsi drive as regards safety and
non-file corruption compared to Fat32?

Gary

"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
news:koi2i0tvv2ncpq9m7a694qsdjj5pgtrlvd{at}4ax.com...
>
> Tolerance of BSOD's is a feature for me.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:17:54 -0400, "Robert Comer"

> wrote:
>
> >The biggest plus of NTFS is the journaling, and what that means is it
> >basically can take things like power outages and BSOD's much better
without
> >corruption of files.
> >
> >- Bob Comer
> >
> >
> >"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> >news:41208615$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> If you don't need NTFS for security, are there other reasons why you
would
> >> prefer NTFS over FAT32?  I like being able to do things with the Win2K
on
> >> Fat32 partition that I can't so easily do if it were NTFS.  What are
your
> >> thoughts on this?
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> "Ellen K"  wrote in message
> >> news:a09911.061078{at}harborwebs.com...
> >>> So, that's a big deal.  Who uses FAT any more anyway? 
(Although here
> >>> it's
> >> on
> >>> the C drive of my desktop.  But I made them format the second HDD
NTFS.)
> >>>
> >>> > From: "Geo." 
> >>> > "Ellen K."
 wrote in
message
> >>> > news:sos4h0lciqhcjk25tgm2r02tuk07ihcqva{at}4ax.com...
> >>> >> That is really impressive.
> >>> > Only because nobody else has done it on NTFS, heck
on FAT it's a
> >> standard
> >>> > feature.
> >>> > Geo.
> >>
> >>
> >
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5