Re: GUIDE DOG REFUSED ACCESS
 
> The doctor and restaurant owner should have said that they or their 
employees
> have allergies or sensitivity to dogs.   If the judge or city wouldn't 
accept
> that, then that would be unreasonable.  People with guide dogs probably 
have 
> variety of other business establishments they could choose from.  To single 
o
> one business like that and then make a big deal about "guide dog
> insensitivities" is ridiculous.
> .: /|ug
I truely hope I am mis-reading what you just said.  
In the matter of guide dogs, it doesn't matter if someone is alergic to dogs,
in the working place,  they are ALLOWED ACCESS.  BY  LAW. 
most of the folks here see their dogs as pets or family.  For those of us
that are disabled, our dogs ARE our feelers so to speak.  My dog is my ears,
and for blind folks their dogs are their eyes.  To say one is "singling out
one business and making a big deal about guide dog insensitivities" is
defeantly out of hand.  IF I were to go in to a store with my dog, I have
just as much as aright to be there (as my dog does) as you do.  
Please tell me I read your statement wrong..
                           Mzpepper
                           mzpepper@thorny.ml.org
telnet://thorny.ml.org
---
TRAINEES do it as practice
--- Virtual Advanced Ver 2 for DOS 
---------------