From: Mike '/m' 


Tolerance of BSOD's is a feature for me.



On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:17:54 -0400, "Robert Comer"
 wrote:

>The biggest plus of NTFS is the journaling, and what that means is it
>basically can take things like power outages and BSOD's much better without
>corruption of files.
>
>- Bob Comer
>
>
>"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>news:41208615$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> If you don't need NTFS for security, are there other reasons why you would
>> prefer NTFS over FAT32?  I like being able to do things with the Win2K on
>> Fat32 partition that I can't so easily do if it were NTFS.  What are your
>> thoughts on this?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> "Ellen K"  wrote in message
>> news:a09911.061078{at}harborwebs.com...
>>> So, that's a big deal.  Who uses FAT any more anyway?  (Although here
>>> it's
>> on
>>> the C drive of my desktop.  But I made them format the second HDD NTFS.)
>>>
>>> > From: "Geo." 
>>> > "Ellen K."
 wrote in message
>>> > news:sos4h0lciqhcjk25tgm2r02tuk07ihcqva{at}4ax.com...
>>> >> That is really impressive.
>>> > Only because nobody else has done it on NTFS, heck on FAT it's a
>> standard
>>> > feature.
>>> > Geo.
>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5