Hello Shane!

Tuesday October 08 1996 08:36, Shane Rampling wrote to Deon Attard:

 SR> No I didn't, your statement was that he would have the Processing
 SR> Power of a Pentium which is completely INCORECT...Raw speed doesn't
 SR> only determine processing power of a CPU. If you have even a basic
 SR> knowledge of CPU's you will know that a 32 bit chip can't match a 64
 SR> bit chip for processing power.

If you had one spec of comon sence, and didn't just say OHHHH 64 must be better
than 32, got in and tested the two, you would know that they are comparable.

 SR> This statement appears to be just another case in this area where
 SR> people are trying to sell products they know nothing about, or trying
 SR> to CON some poor sucker into buying outdated or old stock.

Very few suppliers stock more than a few cpu's, although I realise you are too
ignorant to know that, thus contradicting your "old stock" theory.  Give up
while you are ahead, when it comes down to value for money, a 5x86 is better
than a P75 every day of the week.  If I ever again see the word
"con" from you 
in a message to me, I will track you down and take the matter further.


Seeya!
                                   Deon

... Don't find faults, discovery remedies.
--- FMail/386 1.02