Hello Frank.

23 Nov 02 16:39, you wrote to me:

 MG>> I would look to it as something that the FTSC would work hand in
 MG>> hand with. Ideally, The FTSC would forward all new proposals to
 MG>> the IFS, and the IFS would communicate to the FTSC, which out of
 MG>> those proposals it feels is most important to elevate to standard
 MG>> status, and also would communicate to the FTSC what needs to be
 MG>> changed from past usages. The FTSC would then have a clear
 MG>> direction and clear goals to work towards, and would not have to
 MG>> sort through dozens of proposals and decide which ones have the
 MG>> most merit.

 FV> Just be careful that the IFS doesn't become the IFNA of past Fidonet
 FV> times.

Wise words; however the IFS will not be a paid membership, and will not be
restrictive in who becomes a member. All who fit the criteria will be
allowed membership. The more the merrier; the goal is to be truly
representative of the network's needs.


--- GoldED/386 3.0.1-dam3