-=> On 01-16-22 11:35, Richard Menedetter wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

 TL> There are arguments for more than a /64 for residential use.  That
 TL> allows for different subnets with different security profiles, such as
 TL> for IoT, the car, whatever other network of smart devices you want.
 TL> For many, I suspect a /60 would be sufficient.

 RM> Sure ... I agree.

 RM> My reply was more from the ISP point of view.
 RM> With 1 v6 subnet it is easy, you just announce the subnet.

 RM> If you allow more, you need a way to configure them. (eg. VLANs,
 RM> different subnet on different LAN port, etc.)

True, and as the market demands it, this will become available (and the vendors
will probably screw it up LOL).  I know I can add a router behind the primary
router.  The main manual setup will be to assign a /64 to the LAN side of that
router.  The existing router will pick up the advertisements, setup routing and
optionally open the firewall for that /64 (so that filtering can be controlled
by the second router).

I haven't put that to the test yet, but tempted to give it a try sometime, as a
learning exercise. :)

 RM> That is added complexity for a low cost product, where most of your
 RM> residential customers will have no clue what this is all about.

If the market demands it, it will come (and in a low cost, easy to use form).

 RM> So it makes more sense to offer that on higher tier (and more
 RM> expensive) services.

I can see that changing.  As I said, when separation of functional networks
becomes a thing.



... Dew knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl mistakes!
=== MultiMail/Win v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux