PE> software like your reader.  Another solution is to ask the reader

FM> The solution is not to have brain-dead software designed by brain-dead
FM> 'C' programmers who use NULLs to define the end of things.

As opposed to your vaporware, with 0 bugs, you mean?  Is that the
trick you Pascal (sorry, Turbo Pascal 7.0 patch level 2) dorks use?  
Don't actually write any software, so that you can slag off at C 
programmers, who are the only ones who are actually capable of
writing useful software?  Yeah, real impressive, I don't think.
If it's one thing I've noticed about people around here, they have
the most absolutely bloody brilliant vaporware you've ever 
seen.  I'm always getting comments like "Hey wow, I've never
seen anything like it before", followed by "Come to think of it,
I've never even seen it".

PE> author to fix his software.  Another thing you were to try was to
PE> vary the quote string, but you said at that stage you were just
PE> going to use proper software.

FM> Well I'm not. I'm using OLX because it's got a usable and useful user

Which makes you send netmail to anywhere except the destination?

FM> interface and I *still* don't know whether all that stuff you've
FM> recommended looks any better than some bloody command line utility in
FM> drag.

It was designed to do the job of reading and writing fidonet
netmail and echomail, as opposed to OLX which was designed for
a different purpose, and the only thing you've been able to
get it to do is send netmail all over the world that was meant
to go to areafix or me etc.  If I were you I'd be hanging my
head in shame at being a complete dickhead and installing proper
software to do the proper job.  But oh no, you're a Turbo Pascal
dork, and you'd rather send empty messages to random locations.
Makes you feel at home.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---