Hi Paul,

On 23 Aug 16 22:23, Paul Quinn wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
  about: "New: PING/TRACE function. Tests requested.":

 WV>> Do you still have the source? Do you know which compiler was used? It
 WV>> might be easy for me or anyone else with a C compiler to help you
 WV>> there...

 PQ> I can't tell as I ran PK-lite over it.  IIRC, it's standard C and only
 PQ> intended as a DOS app.

Can you run Win32 program's on your fido system?

 PQ> The outstanding... longstanding required fix is in the {at}via line loop,
 PQ> where the 'buffer' isn't cleared after each line is written.  You
 PQ> might have noticed the flaw in the response to your PING(?).

I didn't, but it is indeed visible:

* Via 2:280/464 {at}20160818.183220.553.UTC FMail-W32(Pack) 1.69.25.189!
* Via 3:712/848 {at}20160818.183502.UTC RNtrack 1.21/W32!k) 1.69.25.189!
* Via 3:712/848 {at}20160818.183503.UTC hpt/w32-mvcdll 1.9.0-cur 04-11-15!

;)

 PQ> It ought to be FREQ-able as "pingproj" (without the quote
marks).  You
 PQ> may get a giggle out of the hamfisted coding.

I tried that, but didn't get any files (yet):

+ 23 Aug 15:15:47 [24013] call to 3:640/384{at}fidonet
  23 Aug 15:15:48 [24013] trying quinnspost.nodelist.net [122.148.59.26]...
  23 Aug 15:15:48 [24013] connected
+ 23 Aug 15:15:48 [24013] outgoing session with
quinnspost.nodelist.net:24554 [122.148.59.26]
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] OPT CRAM-MD5-896d76a9ee76797a0458febe1c30821f
+ 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] Remote requests MD mode
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] OPT PLZ
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] SYS Quinn's Post
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] ZYZ Paul Quinn
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] LOC Maryborough, QLD, OZ
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] PHN quinnspost.nodelist.net
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] NDL XW,CM,IBN,IEM:eskimo261{at}bigfoot.com,PING
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] TIME Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:15:48 +1000
- 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] VER
Radius/4.010/21.01.2005,13:56(Final-Release)/Win32 binkp/1.1
+ 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] addr: 3:640/384{at}fidonet
+ 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] addr: 3:640/1010{at}fidonet
+ 23 Aug 15:15:49 [24013] sending /home/fido/outbound.003/02800180.req as
ad899479.req (9)
+ 23 Aug 15:15:50 [24013] sent: /home/fido/outbound.003/02800180.req (9,
9.00 CPS, 3:640/384{at}fidonet)
+ 23 Aug 15:15:51 [24013] done (to 3:640/384{at}fidonet, OK, S/R: 1/0 (9/0 bytes))

Did it get processed in any way? Maybe you can send the file?


Btw: I think 'send' is corrent here. I used google, and found: "'Send'
is the present tense, 'sent' is the past tense.'" ;)
Now I will have to try and remember that. Will be difficult. ;)

Wilfred.

--- FMail-W32 1.71.3.200-B20160822