db>> HPFS was designed from the ground up to be robust - despite what

db>> problems people may have, it's a pretty damn clever piece of work.



BG>> And it's been around long enough to have most of its bugs ironed out by

BG>> now anyway (which is presumably why I've never had a single problem with 

 RS> it



 RS> Plenty can say that about FAT drives too. Doesnt prove much.



db>> Throughout OS/2 2.1 and 3.0, I've had system crashes (hardware

db>> reset style) that have never lost a thing on any HPFS partition.



BG>> Same here.  If the auto chkdsk finds problems here, it has always been

BG>> able to fix them on its own, and I've lost nothing either.  Not once.



 RS> This is being rather economical with the truth. You have in fact had

 RS> quite a number of times where you had entire files disappear etc.



 RS> Has anyone ever suggested to you that you are a natural born zealot ? |-)



Ahh, a Zealot Zealot

And I've ze_alot of Zealots in my time.



Russell



--- Terminate 4.00/Pro