> > What my Prime Minister thinks, is irrelivant.  He is an idiot in any
 >
 >  -- I would't have put it that way, but I've heard others mutter
 > something similar... :)
 >
No doubt .  I find it reprehensible that an elected official would
tear down treaties with the provinces (states), that directly benefit
the people of those provinces, so that they can instead put in their
version of the program.  This not only alienates the provinces, but a
lot of people as well.


 > > this, and would probably use it in an instant against Israel.  Only
 >
 > We agree?

So it seems.  Contrary to what you may sometimes read here, I do have
some sane ideas 

 > > one problem with that.  They would wipe out Palestine as well.
 >
 > Yes, but for the greater good of their purpose.  Everyone who died would be
 > in their version of heaven with all those virgins...

I wonder where they find all those virgins.

 > > > > efforts to not allow another country to arm themselves thus.
 > > > Not if they aren't responsible.
 > > Huh?
 >
 > Ahh -- I misread your statement and perceived the opposite of what you
 > actually stated.  My fault.

Ahhh!!

 > I believe there are countries that currently exist that would be very
 > trustworthy with nuclear weapons.  Iran (imho) is one we should NOT allow.
 > While most of the European Union, NATO, *AND* it looks like the UN
 > (including China and Russia) also agree now, what do we do?

How about North Korea?

--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32