| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Z7 again |
My dear man,
> That's right, denegrate their efforts. That should move them
> over to your side of the issue with smiling faces.
I kept on the sidelines during the ZCC-discussion and offered no opinion to
avoid that people such as yourself could accuse me from pushing an agenda
or interfering.
That does not keep you from accusing anyway which can only come from the
fact that you have no clue what you're talking about. So what else is new?
The other ZC's reached a majority-conclusion in that debate and I only
concurred when the raised hands had already been counted.
If you have a problem with the ZCC-decision then it seems I'm the onlyone's
motives you don't need questioning as it was already a done-deal anyway
when I involved myself.
And since you're not in favour of weighed voting you cannot expect me to
push weight around, do you? ;-)
> Now, ask yourself: Why are the Russian nodes decreasing?
Let me try ...
For the same reason why zone-1 decreased from 16,000+ sysops to 437, zone-2
went from 16,000+ sysops to 5,519 and zones-3-4-6 went from viable numbers
to what is left now?
Take care,
\%/{at}rd
--- D'Bridge 2.53
* Origin: MANY GLACIER *** Preserve - Protect - Conserve *** (2:292/854)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 292/854 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.