** Quoting Kevin Berry to Robert Jung:
RJ> I did not do this before because of the risk of giving away a full
  > skeleton of an archiver program.  Someone could make use of it to
  > make a good archiver.  However, currently there are a lot of good
  > archivers out there.
KB> No offense or anything meant, but isn't that you got ARJ,
  > by using the LHArc source code?
I believe it was AR001.ARJ (and/or AR002.ARJ).
But, ARJ has tons more power/flexibility than LHArc ever did.
            --From Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, NY, Sat, 07-20-96--
                --Internet: joe.negron@consultant.com--
--- Maximus/2 3.01
1:278/216)
---------------