Hello Andrew!

Monday January 14 2019 02:45, you wrote to me:

 > Hello Vince!

 > 10 Jan 19 14:31, you wrote to me:

 VC>>>> I have reported this before as far as the first isue but found
 VC>>>> a second problem :

 VC>>>> 1.  The size counts are double than the actual figures.
 VC>>>> 2.  Aging is also wrong but in this case way wrong for example
 VC>>>> showing a node
 VC>>>>     with
 VC>>>>     ...H..   0  33010108 10/20h 2:250/9@fidonet

 VC>>>>  where the files arrived over the last two days and mail
 VC>>>> packets only go back 2 days.

 >>> I will take a look at this over the next few days.  I think the
 >>> age may be the last successful outbound connect to that system,
 >>> but I won't know until I look at the code.  As far as the size
 >>> issue, I should be able to check that at the same time.

 > My initial review of the code did not turn up anything that looks out
 > of whack. I even manually added up what was in the queue for one of my
 > downlinks that was marked undialable, and it came out exactly to the
 > byte on size, and the age appeared to be that of the oldest file in
 > the queue for him.  Does the node that you see the problem with use a
 > filebox?

No, no nodes have boxes set up.

Had problems with them a few years back that may have been the reason why some
nodes was getting echos for others so just killed them all off.


Vince

--- Mageia Linux v6 X64/Mbse v1.0.7.11/GoldED+/LNX 1.1.501-b20150715