RICHARD TOWN wrote in a message to DAVID BOWERMAN:
 RT> As usual loadsa smoke, waffle, and character attack:  presumably as
 RT> flacid substitute for any kind of defence.  And nothing about V34
 RT> interop
 RT> Awaiting with trepidation USR's "implimentation" of v.pcm
 RT> But don't hold your breath for interop 
 DB> Perhaps you should check the story that Rockwell is not going to be
 RT> "Story" is right.
Interesting.  The story is still the same when I check Rockwell's web site.  
The only company that they mention doing interop testing with uses Rockwell's 
server chipset.  Of course, if 3Com claimed that the only interop testing 
that they would be doing was with Total Control equipment, you'd be screaming 
about this.
 DB> But then, I mustn't forget that to you, anything screwed up by
 DB> Rockwell is the fault of other folks for not being able to handle
 DB> Rockwell's screwups.
 RT> And still there's nothing about USR's once fabled V34 interop... 
Still harping that it is USR's fault that Rockwell screwed up?  Why don't I 
see you screaming at Rockwell to fix their broken code.  As has been 
mentioned several times, the analyzer output clearly shows that Rockwell is 
where the screwup occurred.  Not USR, not Lucent, not Cirrus Logic.
Regards,
       David
--- timEd/2 1.10+
---------------