in 16079 20171227 180900 "R.Wieser"  wrote:
>Alister,
>
>> that was an explanation as to why we wanted it
>
>Bullshit.  *You* wanted something, even though you had absolutily zero
>kelvin idea about if it was actually usable.
>
>> i tried to move things forward
>
>To be honest, I can even believe that.
>
>> by geting you to provide the group with full information (i believe
>> I even said WE not I may be able to help)
>
>Kiddo, you where

ITYM "were"

 in *no* position to determine if I had-or-had-not already
>posted that "full information", but you could not care less and tried show
>off.  Which in turn pissed me off.
>
>You see, I take my responsibilities as the one who asks the question rather
>seriously, and try to make it as concise as I can: providing all the
>relevant info, while removing as much of the cruft as possible.
>
>So, you got challenged.  All you had to do was to fess up, and I would have
>let you off the hook.   But no, you just kept digging.
>
>> you have a history of asking incomplete questions & then requiring
>> more & more information untill it becomes apparent that you did not
>> understand
>
>And here you are now, throwing mud and hoping it will stick.
>
>
>Kiddo, if you *really* want to help someone with a problem, than keep your
>mouth shut when you realize that you have no idea to what actually has been
>asked.
>
>Regards,
>Rudy Wieser
>
>P.s.
>> And by the way you have not even told us what language you are
>> programming in
>
>You got me there I'm afraid.   So, tell me: How would knowing it help you ?
>:-)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05