GV>  CB> If I know in advance that I'm going to be doing to/from a directory 
on
GV>  It makes sense that tagging should do this ... is the directory in your
GV>  path?
No.  It was in a 'temp' dir several sub dirs deep and rather than try
and remember how the file & subdirs were named, I just figured that
since tagging it knew where it was at, that it would still remember it
when I started to send the tagged file to attatch it to the message.
GV>  How did you get a beta?  Anyway, I feel that the last beta was better
I didn't say that I had a beta.  I said that to me, there is no
difference between a 1.00 and a beta release.  A lot of companies use a
1.00 release to work out the bugs, then release a couple of quick bug
patches.  Telix for Windows is an interesting example of that.  It's
been out year (or maybe a bit less) and they've already gone through 6
patches and updates and it still doesn't work right.  (Or so I've heard
from lurking in the Telix echo.)
GV>  Hang it there.  TMW is a good product ... but as any 1.00 release, it
GV>  is far from perfect.  BTW, you probably know, but the next release will
GV>  "probably" be WIN32 version as well.
In that case, I certainly wont be running it.  (I assume you mean
Win95.)  Personally I don't like Windows enough to spend $100 to
downgrade to W96, and then an extra $500 to upgrade my hardware so I can
run it just to do the same things I used to could do on an XT.
--- QScan/PCB v1.18b / 01-0162
---------------