JDBP>  You are not wrong. Indeed, may software development houses use OS/2
JDBP>  for developing DOS and Windows programs.  I used to write DOS programs
JDBP>  under OS/2 using Borland C++ 3.1 for DOS myself.  That is until I got
JDBP>  hold of an OS/2 compiler and discovered the joy of OS/2 programming.  (-

I'm trying to convince the shop I work for, AT&T Business Translations
to do that. I'm three times more productive on the machine at home then
the one at work which is a faster machine. I must admit I'm still using
BC 3.1 for DOS, but I'm toying with the idea of getting BC 1.5 for OS/2
or Watcom 10.0. I just downloaded the GNU projects C++ and compiled my
first PM program with it, its actually very nice, the documentation
sucks but for free ...

---
 þ QMPro 1.52 þ John Wicks - AT&T Bus. Translations, Localization Dept.

--- QScan v1.065b