CB>In a reply to Matt S. you wrote---
RM> Of COURSE they share the problem of quality of incoming
RM> materials; that wasn't the issue! The issue raised is that
RM> a tv doesn't reach out and fiddle with the assembly process!
RM> How good would tvs be if each tv could elect to accept, or
RM> NOT accept, vital components? How about tvs that can absent
RM> themselves from the assembly line on days of their choice?
CB>Deming states that this problem only accounts for about 15% of the
CB>quality problem, 85% comes from poor management.
Huh?? "This problem" as in a tv not accepting components or
absenting itself?? I must be confused; surely you don't
mean what you seem to be saying?
Maybe you mean Matt's point about incoming materials? That
would make a LITTLE sense! ;-)
___
* MR/2 2.26 * WINDOWS95?!? Been there... Done that!
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------
* Origin: The Reading Room, Woodstock NY, 914-679-4602 (1:272/160)
|