From: "Robert G Lewis" 

Yep

Saddam could do something like agree to let in a large group of French or
Belgium forces to search. That way he could show he was willing to show he
had met his obligations but also stood up against the 'evil' US

I am not in favor of attacking Iraq at the present but those who protest
our attacks are at best misguided. If they are so concerned about the Iraqi
people ( and other third world peoples) where are the marches, the protest
and the support for the oppressed peoples ? Seems only to count if the
'West' is suppressing them. If their own are repressing ( or murdering) them
it doesn't count.

I consider myself liberal but I loathe the thought of being compared to
these marchers.

Bob Lewis

"Richard B."  wrote in message
news:vk025vgetkipt33koq5nsq7i363691g5ct{at}4ax.com...
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:17:27 -0500, "Robert G Lewis"
r.g.lewis{at}verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >If they were to cease their BS they
> >could make a valid case about some of our actions
>
> It occurred to me over the weekend, seeing the marches, that these
> peoples intentions are entirely misplaced. Where was the march against
> the terrorists? (I can hear the parrots already.)
>
> I was thinking if Saddam was serious, he could easily offer means to
> open Iraq to "unfettered" access. Let in the UN/US military forces en
> masse to disarm and search; find a way to hand over the likes of Bin
> Laden (I feel certain he has the contacts to make this happen); and
> give his people freedom in the form of free elections.
>
> He can show he means business if he wants to. He hasn't, he is seeing
> support for his position and I'm sure evil is enjoying his winnings.
> For now.
>
> - Richard

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4