*** Quoting Rick Van Ruth from a message to Carol Shenkenberger ***


 CS> Yes but based on standards in effect already.

RVR> Isn't that what started all this? How *C's are ignoring those standard
RVR> stupid things like 1-000-000-000 (or 000-000-000-000) are used for pho
RVR> number fields? How they allow IBN and other such flags without includi
RVR> FQDN or IP address?

Yes, but it's not so much the fault of the documenters on that one as the
*C's ¨not following it correctly.

RVR> things like " CS> Yes but based on standards in effect
already." above

RVR> How can you agree with the authorised standards on one hand and also a
RVR> with whatever a *C's whim is on the other?

I dont agree with the whims at all.  They need to be fixed.  I'm happy to
help ¨any who are having trouble figuring out a correct listing too
.
                                       xxcarol

--- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4