Hi Bob,

BL> ROFL! Just criticise SOT/EOT; Paul goes right off. I think he
BL> probably realises by now that it is useless and logically
BL> flawed, but he's *published*!
PE> Personally, I enjoy an opportunity to slang off at someone as
PE> brain-dead as you.
BL> But where's your answer? All you do is refer me to your silly screed
BL> on SOT/EOT that is totally flawed. You now say that SOT/EOT can only
BL> be added by the creator of the message. Okay. Why not use a Tearline?
BL> If you are going to add SOT/EOT, you may as well add a Tearline at
BL> the bottom and *any* kludge at the top in *any* position. A blank line
BL> would do.
BL> What's your answer to that, then?

You've gotta ask the big questions...

How many readers/tossers know about SOT/EOT ?
How many readers/tossers have been operating for *years* without it ?
How many readers/tossers give a fuck ?

The Bottom line : Like it's creator, it's totally irrelevant & useless.
@EOT:

---